Fans rally behind LFO cheerleaders
by Mark Andrews
Oct 03, 2009 | 1866 views | 2 2 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Fans bring out the signs
Fans bring out the signs
Friday night’s game between Lakeview-Fort Oglethorpe and Ridgeland high schools brought more than the traditional rivalry. Fans brought lots of signs bearing Bible verses and Christian sayings.

The crowd packed the stands, with many fans wearing “Warriors for Christ” T-shirts.

There’s been no shortage of reaction to the recent ban on the religious signs held by cheerleaders during football games at Lakeview-Fort Oglethorpe High School.

Initially, news reports stated that a verbal complaint over the signs had been made to su-perintendent of schools Denia Reese.

Donna Jackson, a parent of a Lakeview-Fort Oglethorpe High student and a Ringgold resident, said Thursday night on a Ringgold radio program that she did make a phone call to Reese concerning the signs, but it wasn’t to complain.

“I did not call the superintendent and complain that the LFO cheerleaders’ signs vio-lated federal law by promoting religion at a school function,” Jackson said in a statement.

“I did call the superintendent to express concern that the cheerleaders’ signs be done in such a way that all involved were within the ever changing and very confusing lines drawn by the federal courts about such things.”

Reese issued a statement on Thursday, Oct. 1 that Jackson “made the accusation that the school system was breaking the law and that it needed to be stopped.”

On Monday, Sept. 28, the Catoosa County Board of Education determined it is a violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution for signs with Bible verses to be displayed on the football field.

The board said “the U.S. Supreme Court and Court of Appeals have ruled that religious activities at high school football games create the ‘inescapable conclusion’ that the school endorses the religious activity.”

“Violations of these rulings can lead to lawsuits resulting in injunctions, unnecessary le-gal costs and damages that have to be paid by the local taxpayers, and possibly the loss of federal funding.”

Reaction

On Tuesday, Sept. 29, more 500 people came to the polo grounds at Barnhardt Circle in Fort Oglethorpe in support of the cheerleaders.

“It’s freedom of religion, not freedom from religion,” one speaker said.

At this week’s homecoming game against Ridgeland, this should be evident.

Although the display of religious messages on the field has been banned, Lakeview Fort-Oglethorpe High has designated an area for religious signs located roughly 50 yards from the field on the school’s front lawn.

Lakeview-Fort Oglethorpe High principal Jerry Ransom told foxnews.com on Wednesday, Sept. 30, that he expects a large turnout at the designated area.

Rep. Jay Neal said during the rally that he wanted to see the section “filled” with signs.

Tim Wildmon, the president of the American Family Association (AFA), said in a release, “It’s just bizarre that we live at a time where a single complaint from one hypersensitive person can trample the right to free speech for an entire community. We urge Ms. Reese and the Catoosa County school board not to give up the fight but to work with First Amendment law firms to craft a policy that will protect maximum student expression.”

comments (2)
« keithcpa@catt.com wrote on Monday, Oct 05 at 10:46 AM »
Acknowledging God in the public square is not the same thing as establishing a religion. Words like "in God we trust" which the Federal Government prints do not establish a Baptist religion over a Methodist, Catholic, Mormon, Pentecostal, Church of Christ, Seventh Day Adventist or Presbyterian. What these words do is document a philosophy of Government that says the Government is under God and that God is over Government. Our Government was designed to be limited and not powerful enough to take away rights given to us by God.

I do not see how positive statments of character and positive statments about God could be construed to be establishing a religion unless we want to define Athesist, Hunanist, and Agnostic groups that deny God's existence as a religion.

I do not believe the government should establish its own religion. But we all should support and uphold the foundation of our government which is the philosophy of one nation under God.

« capt.obvious1 wrote on Saturday, Oct 03 at 10:54 AM »
'“It’s freedom of religion, not freedom from religion,” one speaker said.'-That says it all.

Watching that video made me happy to see the youth in the area come out and stand up for what they believe in and not letting the politically correct world of the new world order hold them down.

Being that really, the government (in all its ummm glory) does not have constitutional authority to even be involved in the educational system (let alone health care) and this is a nice way to see people with strong beliefs stand up for their rights.

If one person can get what they want and force everyone else out of what they see as a right, considering it was just a sign and not a forced gospel meeting of some sorts, then I really do think that these are the signs of the times we live in.

Great video and story!



It is nice to see a story that has both sides and doesn't just pick one.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at the our discretion.