Multi-member commission? Walker County commissioner candidates discuss pros, cons
by Christi McEntyre
Oct 03, 2012 | 3506 views | 5 5 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Bebe Heiskell (left) and Ales Campbell
Bebe Heiskell (left) and Ales Campbell
slideshow
The Nov. 6 general election is not a referendum for Walker County, but in one race, it may as well be, as the choice between incumbent sole commissioner Bebe Heiskell and write-in candidate Ales Campbell has all but come down to a preference for a sole commissioner or multi-member commissioner form of government.

Although electing Campbell would not immediately turn the commissioner's office into a five-person board, she has said that, if elected, her first task would be to approach the Georgia legislature to ask for a county referendum vote to be allowed for the people to determine the type of government they desire.

Heiskell: One person, one point of contact

Heiskell, who is seeking her fifth term as sole commissioner, believes the county would be better served by retaining that form of government.

“If you have a multi-member commission, there’s less responsibility for each of those commissioners. They only represent one area, so unless they’re able to garner the support of the other four commissioners, they don’t get much done,” said Heiskell. “If that’s the form of government where people feel the most comfortable, that’s fine, but it’s very easy to pass the buck.”

Heiskell pointed out that a multi-member board of commissioners could be more expensive to operate than a sole commissioner as well. “The cost associated with it is that you have five people who have salaries, expense accounts, pensions, cars, cell phones, et cetera,” she said.

Furthermore, there are two ways a multi-member commission can function, she said. In the first, which is used by Dade County, a multi-member commission “can have an elected official who serves as chair and is a full-timer,” Heiskell explained. The other option is to have a figurehead-style chairperson, with the more tedious operations of the county delegated to a professional manager, which the commissioners hire into county employ after they are elected.

Walker County inducted its first sole commissioner on January 1, 1941. The county at the time was in such dire financial straights that, according to Heiskell, his first act while in office was to take out a $25,000 bond so that county government could continue to function.

“The grand jury of Walker County asked for a referendum for a sole commissioner form of government because Walker County government was failing as a government and they felt that it needed the strength of one person to have financial stability,” said Heiskell.

The referendum was held in 1939; the election took place one year later. Walker County did have a five-person board of commissioners once again for a small period of time until the 1974 election; it has remained a sole commissioner form of government ever since.

Though it may seem outdated to some, Heiskell believes that a sole commissioner form of government is very effective.

“Bartow County, they just held a referendum in 2008 to see if they wanted a multi-member commission,” she said, “and they chose to go back to a sole commissioner. There’s over 100,000 people in Bartow County; it’s a big place. And he’s done really well.”

Heiskell also feels from personal experience that bringing new industry into an area is much more easily accomplished with a sole commissioner acting as a one-person point of contact.

“In my opinion when dealing with industry they really like dealing with a sole commissioner form of government. And that has been my experience one hundred percent of the time,” she said.

Campbell: Five commissioners, five accountability partners

Campbell believes the ability for five separate commissioners to provide checks and balances for each other far outweighs any pros of having just one point of contact.

“In making big decisions, you can never have too much input,” she said. “It may make the process of a decision longer but I feel that's not a bad thing.

“It puts a lot of weight on the people to actually elect a good representative for their district...I feel those representatives have the task of bringing the ideas and opinions of the people to the board.

“I honestly believe in having more than one person to represent the people, especially with the number of people in this county,” she said.

Should she be elected, Campbell hopes to conduct a study to present to the Georgia legislature detailing how best the county could be split into five equal districts.

“One of the things that people have said is that 'Oh, Chickamauga's going to be this, and Chattanooga Valley's going to be this, we're going to have LaFayette like this.' I don't think that's how we need to divide it,” she said. “I want to hire a company to come in and take a look at how we can divide and redistrict based with city residents and rural residents in the same district. Not so that we have any one city that has any more voice or any people that feel left out.”

Campbell hopes that the legislature, which is not obligated to use a county's study, will nonetheless follow its lead.

“We can do our own study and we can give it to them but that doesn't guarantee that they'll follow it,” she admitted.

Unlike Heiskell, Campbell believes that a five-person board of commissioners could actually cost the taxpayers less, salary-wise, than one sole commissioner.

“You're looking at a minimal expense to the taxpayers,” she said. “It's not like they're going to be making $50,000 a year...It's not a full-time position.”

Campbell hopes to institute a chairperson-style board of commissioners, without the need for an outside manager, though she admits she is open to change should the need arise.

“I believe that person should be elected by the board. That's not set in concrete for me.”

Overall, she sees a change toward a multi-member commission as the best way forward for Walker County. The referendum process in and of itself could take upwards of two years, and Campbell is eager to get started.

“I honestly believe that this is the right time to make this change,” she said.

Comments
(5)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
windcrestviewpoint
|
October 05, 2012
Ms. Campbell owes the State of Georgia $10,873.74 in back income taxes.

Visit Windcrest Viewpoint and see the document

http://www.facebook.com/WindcrestViewpoint

Orwell
|
October 03, 2012
It is obvious that someone needs to address the charge that is made that Commissioner Heiskell is standing in the way of people deciding the form of government they want, so here goes.

The commissioner, whether it is Ms. Heiskell or Ms. Campbell, does not have the power to change the form of government for the county. Only the Georgia legislature can do that. All anyone has to do is petition the state delegation. Heiskell does not have the ability to stand in the way of the people asking the state for a referendum and neither does Campbell have the ability to change the form of government without the blessing of the state assembly.

A perfect example, Buddy Chapman ran on the same promise to deliver the five man board to Walker County in 1996. Why was the promise not fulfilled? It is because the commissioner doesn't have the power to change the form of government. The state constitution is designed this way so that a person can't just change things to suit themselves once they are in office. Every commissioner has to follow the rule of law and the law states that only the state legislature can make this change.

Those of you who buy into the delusion that Campbell or Shaw can deliver a five man board will be disappointed if they are elected. I am not saying that either would be a bad commissioner but they, alone, can't deliver this promise.

The old saying applies here. Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it. Walker County had a board of commissioners until 1941. It was changed by the people because this board bankrupted the county. People wanted to be able to hold someone accountable. (Yes this is in any history book about the county.) This is why the voters choose to go to the sole commissioner form of government. If the person elected does a bad job, you can vote them out. I would hate to see Walker County fall into the same whole it climbed out of years ago.

I would love to have the option of seeing the sole commissioner form of government brought to a referendum here. I think many of our people would love to see ours changed because nothing gets done here. It is simply constant finger pointing and blaming each other for the lack of progress. It is such a shame that the some of the people in Walker County can't recognize the good thing they have with their sole commissioner. But, this is only my opinion
Orwell
|
October 03, 2012
Sorry for the grammatical errors. Typing on this small keyboard is tuff!
innwga
|
October 03, 2012
Bebe said, Bartow County held a referendum. Then Bebe, why not let the Walker County voters make that same choice here for a sole or multi-member commission? Not just ONE person thinking what is best for a population of about 70,000. Let the PEOPLE decide ... not a dictator. There is 3141 county in the USA, 3042 have multi-member commission ... These numbers speak for themself 100%, not just someone opinion.
ACitizenWalker
|
October 04, 2012
I would like to see the performance standards of sole commish counties VS multi-member counties. Those numbers would reflect the real story.

Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.