Uncompensated care continues to drain Hutcheson hospital’s coffers
Apr 20, 2012 | 2495 views | 3 3 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Erlanger at Hutcheson
Erlanger at Hutcheson
slideshow
Uncompensated care continues to strain hospital finances, Elranger at Hutcheson officials said Wednesday. Hutcheson lost $1.76 million in March, finance committee members learned during an April 18 meeting.

The Fort Oglethorpe hospital had estimated a March loss of $351,306. Over the past six months, Hutcheson has lost $7 million, according to a March financial report.

“March was a difficult month,” Hutcheson CEO Roger Forgey said in a news release. “We treated a substantial amount of patients unable to pay for their medical care.”

Hutcheson managed to keep some expenses under budget, such as salaries and supplies, according to hospital controller Denise Baker. Operational costs were $386,312 under budget, Baker said.

Baker told committee members the hospital had a daily average of 23 acute care visits, five less than was budgeted. In March 2011, Hutcheson had a daily average of 38 acute care visits.

Surgeries were down, according to Baker. Hutcheson projected 555 surgeries for March, but only 329 surgeries were performed last month. In March 2011, 559 surgeries were performed.

There were 45 births in March, seven less than was budgeted, according to Hutcheson’s March financials. Last March the hospital had 48 births.

However, the adjusted number of patient days was more than was expected, Baker said. In March, the hospital had 2,872 patient days, 164 more than was budgeted.

Outpatient visits rose to 6,633 in March, 393 more than last year, according to the hospital’s monthly finance report. And there were 243 more emergency room visits this March than last.

Hutcheson entered into a management agreement with Erlanger Health System in May 2011. Hutcheson has so far received $9.9 million of a $20 million credit line from Erlanger. The Fort Oglethorpe hospital serves patients in Catoosa, Walker and Dade counties.

Hutcheson is striving to improve its fiscal health by cutting costs and expanding services to patients, hospital officials said.

“We need the support of north Georgia residents and physicians with referrals and admissions,” Forgey said. “We are rebuilding our physician base and controlling our costs, but we need the entire support of this community for this hospital to be successful.”

Comments
(3)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
number6
|
April 24, 2012
Erlanger has lost $17.1 million year to date. Hutcheson has used nearly half of the $20 million dollar credit line from Erlanger. When the rest of the credit line is used up in say November or December what then? Will Erlanger offer more money to Hutcheson? Will Erlanger, given their financial mess even be in a position to offer more credit? Will the Catoosa County Commission throw more credit at the Hutcheson backed by property tax revenue taken from all property holders? These are issues that need to answered by candidates running for the commission. Does Catoosa keep pouring money in to Hutcheson or sale it off? All citizens of Catoosa need an answer to this question prior to the elections.
catsport
|
April 20, 2012
Same issues, same basic problem of overcoming a bad Hutcheson reputation among both doctors and potential patients.

Same issues, same results. More money losses.

Roger Forgey is very capable of turning this mess around - the Hutcheson Board keeps the curse alive via "Hutcheson".

Turn it into "Erlanger" and survive.

Why do they keep referring to this hospital as "Hutcheson" if "Erlanger" is really taking over?

Bernard22
|
April 24, 2012
"Hutcheson" hospital should have been sold for pennies on the dollar at a bankrupcy or foreclosure to a for profit corporation and then gutted and reopened as a totaly new hospital or made into a medical mall or other purpose.

I never could understand why the county commissioner's for the tri counties wanted to keep this place open - except for the uninsured that use the emergency room like a doctor's office that they don't have to pay for services. Guess they, too, have to go someplace for care - then the losses should be of no suprise.

Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.